Really, I will. As soon as I finish it up and send it off to the publishers. But until then, here's an example of the latest text to fall under "things that annoy me about this project":
Hence the number of frequencies to be selected must be judiciary decided. The same holds two for the other analysis technique i.e. Short Time Fourier analysis and wavelet analysis.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40dd4/40dd4b0921d47569b768b535bc70ddf48a720179" alt=""
This needs a whole lot of fixin' on a whole lot of levels, and I know it's my job as editor to do that fixin' to the best of my non-science-brain ability. But I am beginning to think they "wrote" this book by dictating it into the very speech-recognition software that they are describing how to build (the subject of this particular chapter). Couldn't they have at least given the chapters a quick proofread before sending everything off to be published?
And on another note, I now have an image of the authors looking like Lili von Shtupp in
Blazing Saddles, singing "Morning, noon, and night, it's dwink and dancing / Some quick womancing / And then a shower."
When I'm not farming, I teach English as a Second Language. And all I can say is have fun with that project. And it will be funnier if you drink, which was my strategy for many a late night grading session :)
ReplyDeleteJust finished a couple glasses of wine with dinner. Should make things go faster, and maybe I'll understand it better! Thanks for the advice :-)
ReplyDelete